Case study · Execution & impact

Designing for the hardest user in the building

Most fintech design makes the complex feel simple. The Options Scalper Terminal was the opposite: the user wants complexity, at speed, with zero margin for error.

At a glance SHIPPED
role
Design lead & oversight — direction, quality bar, alignment
product
Real-time terminal for high-frequency options traders
timeline
Q2 2024 · ~3 months
system
Built on FDSG
outcome
deeper, stickier engagement

The problem

High-frequency options traders — scalpers — live in seconds. They place many orders, react to fast-moving prices, and judge a tool by whether it disappears into muscle memory.

For them, a slow interaction, a buried action, or an ambiguous state isn't a mild annoyance — it's money. The design challenge was to build a terminal dense enough to be powerful and clear enough to be safe, at the exact moment the stakes are highest.

Get it wrong and you lose your best, most active users. Get it right and you deepen the relationship with exactly the traders who matter most to the business.

Visual to add

The terminal, full view — annotated to show where the density is doing work rather than adding noise.

The design challenge

Four constraints shaped everything, and each one pulled against another:

The last one, running

The Lab order ticket makes error-prevention-at-speed literal: you press and hold to confirm. Same idea, built as a working component you can try.

Visual to add

The core fast-action pattern — one-tap entry, presets, and the keyboard path.

Visual to add

Real-time state treatment: how "now" is made legible without a redraw.

How I led it

I didn't design every screen — I set the direction and defended the standard. My role was to keep the work honest to two things at once: what these traders actually need, and what the business needs from them. That meant running design critiques against real trader workflows, setting the interaction principles the team designed to, and aligning everything to FDSG so the terminal felt like part of the platform, not a bolt-on.

The clearest call I made was keeping the default view deliberately uncluttered. There's always pressure to surface everything on a power-user screen, but I held the principle that the terminal should disappear into muscle memory — so we defended progressive disclosure and resisted piling analytics onto the default layout, even when it was tempting.

That restraint is what let the density stay usable at speed.

The outcome

The proof is in the behaviour of the hardest-to-please users on the platform — they leaned in.

~15% longer sessions — deeper engagement, not just more visits.
~17% MAU growth on the terminal over the period.
high daily order volume per user — the signature of a tool people live in rather than visit.
at scale hundreds of thousands of successful orders placed through the terminal to date.

Taken together: the traders who are quickest to abandon a clumsy tool instead spent more time in it and placed more through it. For a trading product, that's the engagement signal that matters most.

Visual to add

A simple engagement chart — session duration or MAU trend across the period.

Keep reading